[Bug 18908] Consider disallowing expandos on objects with a named getter but no named setter

# bugzilla at jessica.w3.org (4 years ago)

www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Nasserbufahad@gmail.com changed:

       What    |Removed                     |Added

             OS|All                         |Windows 3.1
Contact us to advertise here
# bugzilla at jessica.w3.org (4 years ago)

www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Cameron McCormack cam@mcc.id.au changed:

       What    |Removed                     |Added

     Whiteboard|                            |[v1]
# bugzilla at jessica.w3.org (7 months ago)

www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Anne annevk@annevk.nl changed:

       What    |Removed                     |Added

             CC|                            |annevk@annevk.nl

--- Comment #1 from Anne annevk@annevk.nl ---

Is this still what you want heycam?

# bugzilla at jessica.w3.org (7 months ago)

www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

--- Comment #2 from Boris Zbarsky bzbarsky@mit.edu ---

I think as filed and in full generality this is not web compatible. I'm 99% sure people put expandos on "document".

# bugzilla at jessica.w3.org (7 months ago)

www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

--- Comment #3 from Anne annevk@annevk.nl ---

I would suggest we close this then since nobody should be using named getters on new objects anyway.

# bugzilla at jessica.w3.org (7 months ago)

www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Anne annevk@annevk.nl changed:

       What    |Removed                     |Added

     Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
         Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

Want more features?

Request early access to our private beta of readable email premium.